No
two persons write in the same way. And this is what makes writing a difficult
craft to teach. However, if you have been a successful fiction writer for many
years, it’s likely that the net of your knowledge would be so vast as to cover
varied grains of thoughts or be based on methods which have produced results
time and again.
That’s why Stephen King’s book on writing – Stephen King on
Writing, A Memoir of the Craft – makes lot of sense regardless of which school
of thought you come from. In the first half of the book, King takes you through
his life, his growing up years and coming of age as a novelist and then the
book becomes a writing manual where King provides you with his views on novel writing
he has framed based on his experience as practitioner of storytelling for
several decades now.
King
comes from an American lower middle class family comprising a single mother and
brother. King grew up in a small town of the US and started dabbling in writing
at a very young age. He ran a newspaper with his brother from their garage
which eventually closed down. He wrote for his school magazine and offended a
teacher so much with his writing that she held it against him and denied him an
opportunity many years after the writing was published in school magazine.
He
wrote short stories for various magazines and received more rejection notes than acceptance letters. But gradually the rejection notes started arriving with small
pieces of advises and sometimes ‘submit again’. In the meantime, he did odd
jobs trying to make ends meet after he got married with the girl he had met at
a writing seminar, Tabby, who continues to be his Ideal Reader (or first reader,
critic) for all his works. The publication of Carrie – King’s debut novel –
marked the end of King’s struggle as a writer (and also financially).
When
I started reading the book, I expected it to be a writing manual but King
surprised me by starting the book as an autobiography and then digressing (or
mainstreaming) into the craft of writing. But later, after covering a long
sweep of the book, I realized that the autobiographical part was to inform the
reader what makes King the writer he is and the book confirms that later.
As much
as it is difficult to explain how to handle something which is largely a matter
of instinct and imagination, King has successfully detailed the nuts and bolts
of the craft without going into its theories. He provides a primer on grammar.
Towards the end of the book, King presents the reader with a raw manuscript and
its edited copy in the subsequent chapter. He presents a list of books that, he says,
have helped him.
What
makes the book touchy is that King had put it on hold for sometime because he
met with a truly horrifying accident and had very slim chances of surviving it.
And many months after his release from hospital when he started writing again he
resumed this book and finished it.
