When a new arrival – a book or a
movie - is based on a piece of history you are familiar with, it does not leave
you with too many options – you have to devour it. So when in promo pics of
Silence, the latest movie by Martin Scorsese, I saw two guys with scrubby
beard looking like coming from another time in an exotic mountainous locale, it
piqued my curiosity. (I was not familiar with Scorsese‘s reputation and repertoire.) Upon digging deeper, I came to know Silence deals
with a piece of Japan’s past I had read about many years ago.
The time is 16th
century and Japan is going through a period of extreme religious persecution
aimed at those who have embraced Christianity and Jesuits operating in the
country. Amidst this, two Portuguese jesuits visit Japan to find out about
their mentor jesuit – father Ferrero - who is said to have abandoned his faith in Christianity publicly, and also to help Christians facing persecution in the
country.
This is the period which has a
parallel with post Nagasaki Hiroshima Japan: when the nuclear attack forced the
country into a shell – to rebuild a nation maimed by a war and nuke. Many say
these two incidents and their aftermath left Japan with a permanent paranoia
for the foreigner (much like what the Opium War did for China) which still
informs its public policies. However,
people familiar with the bit of Japan’s history Silence deals with will trace
the source of that paranoia a little further back in time.
An edge-of-the seat suspense takes
you through the first half an hour or so of the film and then it slowly
dissipates and the film gradually settles into an easier pace but a certain tension
continues to characterize the narrative throughout, thanks to the subject, but
also how the director has brought that element to bear upon the narrative.
Given the nature of the subject Scorsese
has chosen for Silence, a plaintiveness running across the film is
understandable. But the scenes depicting the dehumanizing treatment meted out by
Japanese officers to those who have moved to Christianity, mostly poor
villagers, leave you with a sour mood. And this I feel helps the evangelist side get sympathy with the viewer and win the
argument obscuring the viewer to the fact that
the colonial powers often hid sinister intent behind the guise of faith (many
advocates of the Opium War on China had used faith as their justification), a
point that Scorsese’s movie overlooks.
In fact, many would say Silence
is a passionate argument for Christianity - one of the travelling Portuguese
padres dies but the other lives and goes through a forced public denial of his
faith in Catholicism following which he becomes a Buddhist and never
acknowledges his faith in Christianity in his lifetime only to be shown with a
cross in his rolled palm when he is being cremated as per Japanese customs - in
an apparent show of trump of his Christian beliefs.
Be that as it may, I
wholeheartedly rooted for the characters undergoing persecution and the torture
scenes left me downcast for a long time.
Silence is easily a classic,
something which will stand the test of time and be remembered respectfully many
years later for several things – great cinematography (some of the scenes are
simply breathtaking), authentic recreation of a period in history (the
monasteries, the wooden structures, everything looks so much like they have
leapt out of the period) and above everything else a film which powerfully tells a
story showing the two sides of religion – devotion and intolerance.
It’s a must watch.